Claude Squad vs Conductor (2026): terminal TUI or Mac app, and a third option

Claude Squad is a free AGPL terminal app for parallel Claude Code agents; Conductor is a closed-source Mac app. How they differ, and where Orchestrator.inc fits.

Short answer

Claude Squad and Conductor sit at opposite ends of the same idea. Claude Squad is a free, AGPL-3.0 terminal app that gives each agent a git worktree and a tmux session and lets you attach to the agent's own interface. Conductor is a closed-source Mac app that drives Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode through a chat UI and follows your PR checks and review threads. Choose Claude Squad if you live in the terminal and want almost nothing between you and the agent. Choose Conductor if you are on a Mac and want a finished app that helps with the PR. If neither fits, Orchestrator.inc (formerly Agent Orchestrator) is a third option covered at the end.

At a glance

Claude SquadConductor
TypeTerminal appNative Mac desktop app
PlatformsmacOS and LinuxmacOS; iOS app for cloud workspaces
LicenseAGPL-3.0, freeProprietary; free local tier and paid plans
Prerequisitestmux and the GitHub CLIA Mac
Coding agentsClaude Code by default; Codex, Gemini CLI, Aider, OpenCode, Amp, or any CLIClaude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode
IsolationGit worktree plus one tmux session per instanceGit worktree and branch per workspace
Where agents runLocally, and over SSH since it is a terminal appLocally, or Conductor Cloud on paid plans
Agent interfaceThe agent's own terminal UIChat UI plus an embedded terminal
OverviewInstance list with preview and diff tabsWorkspace list grouped by repository
PR and CICommits and pushes the branch; no PR or CI viewChecks tab with CI and review threads; forward failing checks to the agent; block merge on failed checks
NotificationsNone documentedmacOS notifications

All competitor details are as of October 2026.

The problem in practice

You want three Claude Code agents working on one repository without stepping on each other. Both tools solve that part the same way, with a worktree per agent. The split comes after: do you want to stay in the agent's own terminal and handle PRs yourself, or do you want an app that shows checks and review threads and hands failures back to the agent?

How each tool handles it

Task: start an agent on a bug, get the fix through CI, and merge.

In Claude Squad

  1. Run cs in the repo and press n for a new instance. A worktree and tmux session are created and you see the agent's own interface.
  2. Watch progress in the preview and diff tabs.
  3. Press s to commit and push the branch.
  4. Open the PR on GitHub, watch CI, and paste any failure back into the instance yourself.
  5. Merge on GitHub.

In Conductor

  1. Create a workspace; it gets its own worktree and branch.
  2. Chat with the agent until the change is ready, then create the PR from the app.
  3. The Checks tab shows the failing run. Click to forward the failing checks to the agent.
  4. Review and merge from the app, or let automerge do it once checks pass.

Where Claude Squad is a good fit

Where Conductor is a good fit

Where Orchestrator fits better

Orchestrator.inc is worth a look if you like Claude Squad's native terminal UI and open license but want PR awareness, or like Conductor's supervision but need Windows, Linux or the source.

It is heavier than Claude Squad, since it is an Electron app with a local daemon, and it is not a native Mac app like Conductor. Its remote machines run Orchestrator's host rather than connecting over plain SSH.

Pricing

Claude Squad is free. As of October 2026, Conductor's local tier is free with your own agent subscriptions, Pro is $50 per month for cloud workspaces and related features, and Teams is $60 per user per month. Running Orchestrator on your own machines is free and open source (Apache-2.0), with no account needed; you bring your own agent subscriptions or API keys. Optional Orchestrator Cloud plans, for agents that keep working while your laptop is closed, are Starter at $20/month and Pro at $40/month, with Enterprise pricing on request. Orchestrator does not proxy model calls.

Who should pick which

Pick Claude Squad if

Pick Conductor if

Pick Orchestrator if

Try it

If Orchestrator sounds like your fit, the quickstart gets two agents running in their own worktrees in a few minutes. The head-to-heads go deeper: Orchestrator.inc vs Claude Squad and Orchestrator.inc vs Conductor.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Claude Squad and Conductor?

Claude Squad is a free terminal app that runs each agent in a worktree and a tmux session and shows the agent's own interface. Conductor is a closed-source Mac app that wraps agents in a chat UI and adds PR checks and cloud workspaces. The first stops at pushing a branch; the second helps you through the PR.

Does Claude Squad work on Windows?

Claude Squad supports macOS and Linux and does not run natively on Windows as of October 2026. Conductor has no Windows build either. Orchestrator.inc ships a native Windows x64 build.

Does Claude Squad track pull requests or CI?

No. It commits and pushes the branch, and PR creation, CI status and review comments are left to you. Conductor's Checks tab covers this with a manual forward action, and Orchestrator.inc routes failures and comments to the agent automatically.

Is Conductor free?

The local tier is free with your own agent subscriptions. Cloud workspaces and team features are on paid plans. Claude Squad is free. Orchestrator.inc is free and open source on your own machines, with optional Orchestrator Cloud plans from $20/month.

Can I use Codex or Gemini CLI with these tools?

Claude Squad runs Codex, Gemini CLI and any other CLI program. Conductor runs Codex but not Gemini CLI as of October 2026. Orchestrator.inc runs both among its 38 harnesses, and you can install it from orchestrator.inc to try them side by side.

Laatst gecontroleerd op 23 okt 2026. Correcties zijn welkom op GitHub.

Probeer Orchestrator.inc

Gratis en open source voor macOS, Windows en Linux. Gebruik de coding agents die je al hebt.

Meer vergelijkingen

Alle vergelijkingen